The most closely watched battle in Texas state-level politics is the effort by Democrats to flip the Texas House to blue this November. If Democrats can hold the 12 seats they gained in 2018 and take nine more, they will control the Texas House for the first time in more than two decades. The upcoming redistricting process, set to happen in 2021, redraws the legislative maps for both state and federal legislatures and makes this election even more consequential.
Jonathan Boos
$67,033Cash on Hand
$113,113Total Contributions
$131,307Total Expenditures
Are you Jonathan Boos, or someone associated with
their campaign?
Learn about the benefits of claiming your page -
it's free.
Financial Activity
Top Contributors
Total Contributions | Name |
---|---|
$30,000.00 | Empower Texans PAC (DISSOLVED) |
$26,147.95 | Constituents Focus PAC (DISSOLVED) |
$10,005.00 | Joshua Boos |
$7,000.00 | Texas Home School Coalition PAC |
$5,000.00 | David Middleton II |
$5,000.00 | Michael Olcott |
$4,300.00 | Conservative Republicans of Texas |
$2,500.00 | Charles Dick & Amelia Saulsbury Sr |
$2,239.86 | True Texas Project PAC |
$2,000.00 | Mike Denise & Boos |
Top Payees
Total Expenditures | Payee |
---|---|
$56,303.42 | Wishlist Direct / VoterDirect Texas |
$14,000.00 | Macias Strategies LLC |
$8,934.16 | Vici Media Group |
$7,131.40 | Jordan Lichtenwalter |
$7,000.00 | Frontline Political Strategy |
$6,120.49 | Danwal Inc |
$5,500.00 | North Texas Conservative Coalition (DISSOLVED) |
$4,000.00 | Conservative Republicans of Texas |
$3,178.89 | Thomas Doyle |
$3,151.95 | Campaign Marketing Strategies Inc |
Top Personal Contributions
From reports filed by the recipients of these funds, it appears these transactions originated from personal rather than campaign accounts.
Total Contributions | Candidate | Committee |
---|---|---|
$5,500.00 | North Texas Conservative Coalition | |
$25.00 | Jess Fields JR | Fields Jr., Jess A. (Mr.) |
Related Articles
1. Texas Association of REALTORS PAC ($35,867,910): The Realtors are the powerhouse of money in Texas politics. Yes, you might be surprised to find that your realtor’s professional dues support one of the most powerful — and certainly the most well-funded — PACs in Texas. What might be even more surprising is that the Texas Association of Realtors PAC (TREPAC) frequently uses its political heft to support liberal Republicans and the occasional Democrat. Apparently, this cycle, they believed their PAC account was too flush with cash, as they purchased more than $29 million of money market instrument mutual funds at Frost Bank. As for TREPAC’s donations directly to candidates, they appear to be motivated primarily by the desire to curry favor with those in power in Austin. They supported incumbents of every stripe in 2018, from the most conservative Republicans ($101,042 to Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and $60,000 to State Sen. Don Huffines) to liberal Republicans and Democrats ($55,000 to State Rep. Charlie Geren and $50,000 to State Sen. John Whitmire). During the all-important and ideologically-revealing primary season, the Realtors tended to support the more moderate to liberal candidate in each race, including State Reps. Jason Villalba and Wayne Faircloth and State Sen. Kel Seliger this election season. TREPAC’s largest donation to a candidate this cycle was $140,000 to Cody Harris, a realtor himself, who won one of the most watched elections of the primary season to take the seat of retiring State Rep. Byron Cook. With more than $29 million in the bank, $6.7 million dollars cash-on-hand in their PAC account, and the proven willingness to spend it, the Realtors will be a formidable force in Texas politics for the foreseeable future.
And these numbers may tell only part of the story. The totals don’t include any political donations these men and women have given to candidates in federal races, such as the O’Rourke vs. Cruz battle. Moreover, these numbers don’t reflect any donations given to 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) organizations. Courts have ruled that these groups do not have to divulge their donors in order to protect the donors’ rights to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.