On May 1, voters in Lubbock will be deciding the fate of Proposition A, which would declare the City of Lubbock as a “sanctuary for the unborn.” A hot-button issue from the start, Lubbock is experiencing a heightened level of outside interest in this local election. Proposition A was placed on the ballot in response to the opening of a Planned Parenthood clinic, and the subsequent petition and City Council rejections of the sanctuary ordinance that opened the door for a vote.
World Acceptance Corporation Political Action Committee
Texas Committee
$7,196Cash on Hand
$17,588Total Contributions
$14,331Total Expenditures
Financial Activity
Top Contributors
Total Contributions | Name |
---|---|
$2,727.50 | Aggregated Unitemized Contributions |
$2,300.00 | Daniel C Dyer |
$1,150.00 | Michelle Brower Ferguson |
$1,150.00 | Rodney D Ernest |
$1,150.00 | Sera Campos |
$920.00 | David Eric Ragsdale |
$920.00 | David Minick |
$920.00 | Jose J Rico |
$690.00 | Christopher L Burks |
$460.00 | David Roblez |
Top Payees
Total Expenditures | Payee |
---|---|
$2,500.00 | Aggregated Unitemized Expenditures |
$2,500.00 | Anthony Daniels |
$1,500.00 | Andy Zay |
$1,500.00 | Tate Reeves for Governor |
$1,306.14 | Wells Fargo Bank |
$1,000.00 | Kevpac |
$1,000.00 | Raumesh Akbari |
$500.00 | Bob Freeman |
$500.00 | Greg Vital |
$500.00 | Jeremy Faison |
Related Articles
This article is Part 2 of a four-part series demonstrating how the money in a lobby sector can impact state politics and legislation. We’ve selected the Green Energy sector due to a resurgence of interest in a behind-the-scenes look at renewables following the 2021 snowstorms, but you can follow the money in any industry of interest that is spending lobbying dollars in Austin.
In Texas politics, the real financial powerhouse is not the money given by individuals and political action committees (PACs) — it’s lobbying. In fact, in the last election cycle, the money spent on lobbying exceeded all money donated to Texas candidates and PACs by more than $100,000,000.