These are the top 10 individual contributors to California state-level candidates and committees in the 2022 election cycle, according to campaign finance reports submitted to the California Secretary of State:
Committee for Clean Water Natural Resources and Parks - Yes on Proposition 4 Sponsored by a Coalition of Environmental Advocates Across California
California Committee
$378,210Cash on Hand
$3,260,301Total Contributions
$2,783,903Total Expenditures
Financial Activity
Top Contributors
Total Contributions | Name |
---|---|
$689,651.00 | Trust for Public Land The |
$540,000.00 | Save the Redwoods League |
$250,000.00 | Pg&e Corporation and Affiliated Entities |
$250,000.00 | Sempervirens Fund |
$175,000.00 | California State Parks Foundation |
$125,000.00 | The Conservation Fund |
$100,000.00 | California Association of Local Conservation Corps (Calcc) |
$100,000.00 | Southern California Partnership for Jobs (Nonprofit 501(c)(6)) |
$87,500.00 | Regional Parks Foundation |
$79,769.32 | Environmental and Energy Consulting |
Top Payees
Total Expenditures | Payee |
---|---|
$1,450,000.00 | Conservation Action Fund Supporting Plastic Waste Reduction 2022 Sponsored by Environmental Organizations |
$1,080,000.00 | Californians for Safe Drinking Water and a Clean and Reliable Water Supply in Support of Proposition 3 |
$96,503.99 | Nossaman LLP |
$69,528.55 | Environmental and Energy Consulting |
$40,000.00 | Fm3 Research |
$27,000.00 | David Binder Research Inc |
$7,925.00 | Sara Friedman |
$5,878.63 | Mcclatchy Insurance |
$1,519.41 | Nix Accounting |
$1,000.00 | National Audubon Society Inc (Non-Profit 501c3) |
Related Articles
While campaign finance is not the only factor in electoral outcomes, successful fundraising can provide a candidate with advantages during a campaign. Fundraising can also indicate party momentum.
While campaign finance is not the only factor in electoral outcomes, successful fundraising can provide a candidate with advantages during a campaign. Fundraising can also indicate party momentum.