These are the top 10 individual contributors to California state-level candidates and committees in the 2022 election cycle, according to campaign finance reports submitted to the California Secretary of State:
Committee for Clean Water Natural Resources and Parks - Yes on Proposition 4 Sponsored by a Coalition of Environmental Advocates Across California
California Committee
$29,462Cash on Hand
$3,281,150Total Contributions
$3,147,651Total Expenditures
Financial Activity
Top Contributors
Total Contributions | Name |
|---|---|
| $689,651.00 | Trust for Public Land The |
| $540,000.00 | Save the Redwoods League |
| $250,000.00 | Pg&e Corporation and Affiliated Entities |
| $250,000.00 | Sempervirens Fund |
| $175,000.00 | California State Parks Foundation |
| $125,000.00 | The Conservation Fund |
| $100,000.00 | California Association of Local Conservation Corps (Calcc) |
| $100,000.00 | Southern California Partnership for Jobs (Nonprofit 501(c)(6)) |
| $87,500.00 | Regional Parks Foundation |
| $85,618.83 | Environmental and Energy Consulting |
Top Payees
Total Expenditures | Payee |
|---|---|
| $1,450,000.00 | California Council of Land Trusts Action Fund a Committee for Proposition 4 |
| $1,410,000.00 | Californians for Safe Drinking Water and a Clean and Reliable Water Supply in Support of Proposition 3 |
| $123,668.99 | Nossaman LLP |
| $69,528.55 | Environmental and Energy Consulting |
| $40,000.00 | Fm3 Research |
| $27,000.00 | David Binder Research Inc |
| $11,465.00 | Sara Friedman |
| $5,878.63 | Mcclatchy Insurance |
| $2,477.79 | Nix Accounting |
| $2,000.00 | Cecilie Blom Addis |
Related Articles
While campaign finance is not the only factor in electoral outcomes, successful fundraising can provide a candidate with advantages during a campaign. Fundraising can also indicate party momentum.
While campaign finance is not the only factor in electoral outcomes, successful fundraising can provide a candidate with advantages during a campaign. Fundraising can also indicate party momentum.