These are the top 10 individual contributors to California state-level candidates and committees in the 2022 election cycle, according to campaign finance reports submitted to the California Secretary of State:
Committee for Clean Water Natural Resources and Parks - Yes on Proposition 4 Sponsored by a Coalition of Environmental Advocates Across California
California Committee
$29,462Cash on Hand
$1,521,249Total Contributions
$1,476,639Total Expenditures
Financial Activity
Top Contributors
Total Contributions | Name |
|---|---|
| $475,000.00 | Save the Redwoods League |
| $250,000.00 | Pg&e Corporation and Affiliated Entities |
| $125,000.00 | The Conservation Fund |
| $100,000.00 | California State Parks Foundation |
| $100,000.00 | Sempervirens Fund |
| $100,000.00 | Southern California Partnership for Jobs (Nonprofit 501(c)(6)) |
| $50,000.00 | California Association of Local Conservation Corps (Calcc) |
| $50,000.00 | John Muir Land Trust |
| $50,000.00 | Save Mount Diablo |
| $30,000.00 | Ccc Foundation |
Top Payees
Total Expenditures | Payee |
|---|---|
| $1,410,000.00 | Californians for Safe Drinking Water and a Clean and Reliable Water Supply in Support of Proposition 3 |
| $28,040.00 | Nossaman LLP |
| $27,000.00 | David Binder Research Inc |
| $6,350.00 | Sara Friedman |
| $2,477.79 | Nix Accounting |
| $2,000.00 | Cecilie Blom Addis |
| $400.00 | Environmental and Energy Consulting |
| $191.01 | Aggregated Unitemized Expenditures |
| $180.58 | Natalie Nax |
Related Articles
While campaign finance is not the only factor in electoral outcomes, successful fundraising can provide a candidate with advantages during a campaign. Fundraising can also indicate party momentum.
While campaign finance is not the only factor in electoral outcomes, successful fundraising can provide a candidate with advantages during a campaign. Fundraising can also indicate party momentum.