While campaign finance is not the only factor in electoral outcomes, successful fundraising can provide a candidate with advantages during a campaign. Fundraising can also indicate party momentum.
Pico California Action Fund Supporting Schools and Communities First-Yes on 15 No on 20
California Committee
$76,001Cash on Hand
$441,210Total Contributions
$405,594Total Expenditures
Financial Activity
Top Contributors
Total Contributions | Name |
|---|---|
| $350,000.00 | Pico California Action Fund-Yes on 15 No on 20 (Nonprofit 501(c)(4)) |
| $60,000.00 | The San Francisco Foundation |
| $21,209.80 | Pico Action Fund ( Non Profit 501(c) (4) ) |
| $10,000.00 | East Bay Community Foundation (Nonprofit 501(c)(3)) |
Top Payees
Total Expenditures | Payee |
|---|---|
| $100,000.00 | California Calls Action Fund for Schools and Communities First - Yes on 15 (Nonprofit 501(c)(4)) |
| $39,909.82 | Faith in Action Fund |
| $39,024.63 | Working Families for a Better La County Sponsored by La Voice Action |
| $27,108.84 | Pico California Action Supporting Schools and Communtities First |
| $23,942.53 | Inland Congregations United for Change |
| $19,795.15 | Pico Action Fund ( Non Profit 501(c) (4) ) |
| $17,000.00 | Million Voters Project Action Fund - Yes on 15 Sponsored by Social Justice Organizations |
| $16,206.58 | Faith in the Valley |
| $11,000.00 | Sacred Heart Community Services |
| $10,393.54 | Sacramento Act |
Related Articles
This article details the five candidates who raised the most money and lost their election. In the 2022 election cycle, 20 of 20 general elections were contested. The losing candidates are shown along with the percentage of the vote they received compared to the winner. In cases where the race was pushed to a runoff, vote percentages for both advancing candidates are included.